MG401 Leadership in Agribusiness Report Sample

MG401 Leadership in Agribusiness Report

Required

You are required to address the following tasks in your assignment:

• Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the readings on the topic

• Areas of agreement/ disagreement among authors

• Empirical evidence (if any)

• Personal reflection, which might include identification of learning(s), application in a professional or personal context (either actual or aspirational).

• Gaps in the literature that indicate future areas of research

Your report should be structured as follows:

• Title page

• Introduction

• Areas of agreement/ disagreement among authors

• Discussion on empirical evidence provided and gaps in the literature

• Reflection & Conclusion

• References

Solution

Introduction

Transformational leadership is but one of the approaches of management and is useful in increasing levels of worker motivation and innovation. In this analysis, the author presents the level of agreement or disagreement about the research topic, review of findings and discuss the limitations of literature in regard to transformational leadership in modern organizations before suggesting the direction that the literature should take next The paucity of systematic reviews in this area of research is attributed to the fact that.

Areas of Agreement/Disagreement Among Authors

Agreement:

Transformational leadership is well defined by Bass and Avolio (2000) as an effective leadership style irrespective of the organizational space as it cultivates trust and innovation for improved performance. Their studies for MBA Assignment Expert focus on the effect of transformational leadership on employees’ engagement and organizational performance. In support of this, another opines that, transformational leadership is positively related to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and performance, thus providing impetus to the importance of this leadership style in enhancing performance and organizational objectives.

Disagreement:

Draws criticism on the effectiveness of transformational leadership by questioning its overall applicability due to cross-national cultural differences and organizational climates as well as differing industrial relations and workforce requirements. This point of view stresses the notion that there is a lesser likelihood that transformational leadership performs well across various contexts. Likewise, it criticizes Bass and Avolio’s model for such a dichotomy because the nature of leadership could not be so straight-forward, pointing out that transformational leadership may not always bring about positive results where there are organizational cultures that resist change (Greimel, Kanbach and Chelaru, 2023). It is mentioning that the is lacking enough details to give the mechanism of how the transformational leadership relates with organizations factors and personal difference. As highlighted by both critiques, one must look at factors around the strategy in the consideration of the topical theory on transformational leadership.

Discussion on Empirical Evidence Provided and Gaps in the Literature

The document presents powerful empirical support for the effectiveness of transformational leadership in performance indicators including commitment and creativity by Bass and meta-analysis (Kotamena, Senjaya and Prasetya, 2020). However, there are some limitations such as lack of knowledge on how transformational leadership influences performance Besides, positive outcomes are mostly focused on while negative outcomes such as leader dependency or burn out are rarely discussed in the literature This indicates that future studies should consider exploring the long-term impact of transformational leadership and its effectiveness in multiple organizations to present a balanced view.

Reflection & Conclusion

Transformational leadership is claimed to help improve performance but it has limitations as well as considers its feasibility. More detailed research is needed to explore and understand the effects of this leadership style, its correlation with the organizational culture and achievement of the organization’s objectives in order to fully leverage the potential associated to this particular approach. This structure allows to highlight the specific concerns stated in the document and demonstrate its advantages and discrepancies as well as the necessity for the further research.

Reference list

Bass, B.M.; Avolio, B.J., 2000 Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire; Mind Garden: Redwood City, CA, USA,

Greimel, N.S., Kanbach, D.K. and Chelaru, M., 2023. Virtual teams and transformational leadership: An integrative literature review and avenues for further research. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(2), p.100351.

Kotamena, F., Senjaya, P. and Prasetya, A.B., 2020. A literature review: is transformational leadership elitist and antidemocratic? International Journal of Social, Policy and Law, 1(1), pp.36-43.